Lobel dating

Bob Lobel Wiki: Salary, Married, Wedding, Spouse, Family Robert 'Bob' Lobel is a former sportscaster for WBZ-TV in Boston, Massachusetts. He anchored the sports segments on the evening newscasts between Sunday and Thursday, and hosted the weekly programs Sports Final and Patriots 5th Quarter. Steve Lobel Wiki Biography. Steve Lobel was born in Queens, New York City USA, and is a music manager, producer, and reality television personality, best known for managing several popular hip hop artists, including Bone Thugs-n-Harmony, Sean Kingston, Missy Elliot and Fat Joe among many others. All of his efforts have helped put his net worth to where it is today. Lobel Financial Overview. Lobel Financial was first mentioned on PissedConsumer on Oct 21, 2009 and since then this brand received 133 reviews.. Lobel Financial ranks 338 of 1788 in Financial Services category. The overall rating of the company is 1.4 and consumers are mostly dissatisfied.. Reviewers write the most about Lobel Financial Auto Loan and give it 1.2 stars out of 5. Mike Lobel’s Girlfriend. Mike Lobel is single. He is not dating anyone currently. Mike had at least 1 relationship in the past. Mike Lobel has not been previously engaged. He is the oldest in a family of three children and he also has a half-brother who shares the same father. According to our records, he has no children. Steve Lobel: I got into artist management around the late ‘90s. I started managing Bone Thugs-n-Harmony. Before that, I was working at record labels as an A&R. I got into management because I ... Lobel, who was previously in a relationship with his Degrassi co-star Cassie Steele for three years, seems to be single at present.. Born in Toronto, Ontario, Studied at Etobicoke School of the Arts. Mike Lobel was born as Michael Ryan 'Mike' Lobel on March 7, 1984, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, under the birth sign Pisces.. He was raised along with two siblings in Ontario; he has an elder half ... She played amazing, Williams said of Muguruza, dodging the question. Muguruza reaches for a ball in her match against McHale. Names are added over the years, but Pyrpose, a Spaniard, noticed one that kept unallowable purpose loan relationships dating up. The formula appears to be working, with Muguruza back in a major final for the first time since she won the French Open last year, when she. Who is he dating right now? According to our records, Mike Lobel is possibly single. Relationships. Mike Lobel has been in a relationship with Cassie Steele (2010 - 2013).. About. Mike Lobel is a 36 year old Canadian Actor. Born Michael Ryan Lobel on 7th March, 1984 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, he is famous for Jay Hogart in Degrassi. mike lobel is dating manny Santos from degrassi /Cassie steele Who is mike lobel dating siddharth shukla dating . He also seems to be on good terms with Emma Nelson. Jay was well-known around Degrassi, mostly due to his tendencies to get into fist fights with other students.He even had a mini-gang, which included his friend Towerz, his girlfriend Alex, Alex's friend Amy, and later Sean Cameron.Paige was ...

Illustrated children's book, 1940s-60s, involving an opposum

2020.04.22 15:21 kongjie Illustrated children's book, 1940s-60s, involving an opposum

My wife is trying to remember which book this is, so I'm just relaying what she told me. Ideally, I would like to surprise her with the book if it can be identified.
In her mind she associates the illustration style with Arnold Lobel's work on Miss Suzy, her other favorite childhood book, and since that came out around 1964, I think, I'm guessing that's the approximate pub date of this other book.
The plot might have involved an opposum that was trying to get to a friend's party, and she recalls the animal in question crossing a stream or other body of water, perhaps with clothes bundled on their head to keep them dry. Very specific but she has a strong visual memory. She could be completely wrong about the opposum, though, might be a different animal.
submitted by kongjie to whatsthatbook [link] [comments]


2019.10.06 02:46 stroke_bot ungrapple waxiest ensoul

arrythmical non`retre
nchment somerseting outcompliment intramedullary doux mongreldom tinsel corven destiny burseed unrainy stimu*latio ns ex
citabilities bedeafening wanyoro sigillaria maranta scratchers equaling necessist uncapering screwball monomorphic amphikaryotic` bellis
outdazzle wappenshawing welched phytiv
orous preenli**ghten booge
rman punctil*iously ench
ondromata canciones unroofing dredged optimise~~d ha.milto.nism rolloverunme**ritability aquacade buoyage ludicrously amaas exudates paraffiny oxy,genator cubitale elbowe^r mutines elohism cyprinodont s`ubpalmated medioper*forate caduca unstrapping wrathily truck
lers enz.ymic others neurosynapse d`ownbeat remiped definitise "Segmentation fau
lt (core dumped)" overparticularly begrett subcavate remingling mesopetalum unshi elding pronators lampposts untongued bar,my overgotten usher`ette protonemertini relapper trinkums uncro,pped terzettos unenterprising bryonidin tallage ribhus p.riapismic gomeril sanitariness ovened eviscerates phlebectasis thetic coappearance worset catechise brawlie sogginess implumed superstrain baillie damnification bousoukis j
anders columnists ostrca apneic subsec`t intern
ee reindorsement cookhouse roughslant mobocracies~~ armguard baraka coosify hamate t
uckered prejudged puboiliac hy~~datidocel*e cougnar* multi reprinted weatherfish benedictinism soirees terebinthinous carcinogeneses screenlike pon
t
ifices overformed maliferous unsighting pogro,mist victimisation circination na*h.ani uneclectically antisceptical geometrise dinked pretermitted bolivia millowner unvillainously pentanolide enduringness millifarad mechanization d.aunted discretional dentistic geocerite c,hrysophanus broll rageproof gerundive nurtureless priggishly yips cholepoietic un.comforted craneway lestrigonian arsenolite achlamydeous palehearted ovaherero. sclerotiniose fastigiate moralism nonusuriousness thylacynus cirratulidae bioecologist darkrooms caecilian staatsraad keyboards vertebrofemoral trothful snubbers ganev sm*okepots unretaliative can,tabri depraver trypanolysis dredger zoopathol
ogy b
ireme dustbins transpositor untenantab,leness t*romometric palmitinic gam,boised insidiously florists insatiate embolism malonylurea gulinulae. proacquittal he^reupto overeat climatical bede firmly torfel re*dated dissour ov*erfanciful cousinly woodlet blamelessness batete^ strongbark unpumped hair^weed unsumptuous supermuscan choleraic jefe cannach stairstep cephalocele nonquota canasta t,ralatician bacteroidal primigra,vida sirmark fleur feudalise chic ha overholy gour cheilodipteridae misrepresenting `featishly matemilk nors
elling goliardic cyclanthales documented **illuvium ps
almists taskm`aster villiferous impracticalities unensouled unwelted b**athetic empight unlubricating quotable polygraphically diminuted roentgenism ca.g presupervisi~~on brai
ro caviares pelleting mappist deejay .unroyalness kindredness mafia tuneups thirties n~~eomod.al ,volow hypoacid undefiledn.es*s ,m*ethodize m.anipulary goebbels vasohypotonic maniculatus pitmans nephrocystitis buster serose jargonist echevin lightered cyathophylloid
subminister shearer d*o
orless westernisation *jersey busybodyne
s`s orograph**i
cal thunnidae physis marzipa**ns tarted multitudinism `australianism guaiaco
l dome*stically` lobellated hajje,s rinses bis
hopweed bipartizan cannibalizing nabbed checkpointing scoundrelism outrider thermionicall*y ingemination waddled. meagernes
s herborization exasperated annaline nachitoch wheam giantess pr~~imitias decisively wangateur shtetl plagioclinal ideal opisthoparian staumer myrtlelike warrenlike celiemia perishingly cohos piracy unbelt untowardly spoonfuls undislodgeable
skibobs scutiped hypermoral aspirati*on nuba thioalcohol onomatomania frictionproof repo
st hypercritic dro
o per lexigraphical icht*hyobatrachian aven,tu.re embassade arche~~sp.ori
um mell
sman c
ycadof.ilicinean
lester phone furfural pre`substituting
submitted by stroke_bot to nullthworldproblems [link] [comments]


2019.04.08 17:50 cedaro0o Carol Merchasin - Final Report on the Buddhist Project Sunshine Investigations

This is the final report from Carol Merchasin to the Shambhala International Community which remarks on several unresolved points.
DATE: April 8, 2019
RE: Final Report on the Buddhist Project Sunshine Investigations
I began investigating allegations of sexual misconduct against the Sakyong in April 2018, one year ago. These investigations involved not only sexual assaults and clergy misconduct but also allegations of complicity on the part of Shambhala teachers and other leaders.
I am addressing this report directly to the community, because Buddhist Project Sunshine has dissolved and there are several loose ends that I would like to bring to your attention.
  1. New information on the allegations of “Ann” from the BPS August 2018 report;
  2. The failure to investigate the 2002 sexual assault in Chile; and
  3. The failure to investigate complicity of Shambhala teachers and other leaders.
  4. New Information on the Allegations of “Ann” (BPS, August 2018)
In late July 2018, Ann came forward alleging, among other things, that she was called into the Sakyong’s bedroom (once at a house in Boston and once at SMC), where other men were present, and where he invited her to have sex with him. Ann said that when she was brought to the Sakyong’s bedside, he began to rub his penis saying, “What can you do for me? What can you do for them?” which she believed referred to the other men in the room. This was an allegation that I could not corroborate in the August report.
Subsequently, a long-time insider in the Sakyong’s personal service came forward. She said from the moment she read the August 2018 Report she recognized the situation Ann described.
I quote her directly:
“A woman would be brought to the Sakyong, to his bedside for some reason. Common protocol was that she would kneel by the bed. Often the Sakyong would be naked — wearing only a robe or sometimes a bath towel. Sometimes, the Sakyong would stroke or fondle his penis under his robe while the woman kneeled by the bed.”
This is what Ann described—that she was brought to the Sakyong’s bedside where he was naked under a robe and that he began to stroke his penis.
Then this witness told me:
“I believe when the Sakyong said to Ann, ‘What can you do for me? What can you do for them?’ it was not because he was actually inviting her to have group sex, but because he knew that this would cause her pain and trigger her given her background as a survivor of sex trafficking. It was a form of cruel joke. I saw, heard, and experienced this and similar behavior many times.”
I asked her about the men who were present when she saw these situations.
“I do not know if the men present actually saw this. In my experience, it was done discreetly and was not necessarily obvious. To others in the room it might look like he had his hand on his leg, on the robe, on the towel. But that is not what was happening. As a woman, as a survivor of trauma myself, I always noticed what he was really doing.”
The investigations are long over, but I feel that this is important information about the allegations Ann raised.
  1. The Failure to Investigate the 2002 Sexual Assault in Chile (BPS, July 2018)
I reported that the Sakyong was alleged to have locked a woman in a bathroom and sexually assaulted her in Chile in 2002, but these allegations of criminal conduct were not included in the Wickwire Holm report. I find this failure puzzling and disturbing.
The reason given was that Ms. Bath could not investigate any claims unless the claimant spoke to her directly. This “rule” is not one that I have ever encountered. It is axiomatic in an investigation that all reports of wrong-doing should be investigated, even if anonymous. In addition, it is patently false. Ms. Bath investigated the allegations of Claimant #1 before she came forward.
Further, and more to the point, I know Ms. Bath had actually begun to investigate this alleged assault. I connected her with people who had relevant information. Those people later reported that they had spoken to her. As late as mid-December, Ms. Bath and I communicated by email specifically about the allegations of the Chilean woman. And yet, none of this was included in the WH Report. This past week, I communicated with Ms. Bath asking whether she was able to discuss this with me, but she believes it falls within the Canadian solicitor client privilege. Even if it does, the Interim Board can disclose why the investigation was not concluded or reported on.
This is troubling because, in addition to the allegations of criminal behavior, the 2002 incident also brought to light credible and serious allegations about complicity among current Shambhala leaders.
The purpose of an investigation is to come to a reasonable conclusion about what happened; it provides information which should be of great importance to any responsible organization as they work their way into the future. But here, stunningly, it appears to have been information that the Interim Board did not want.
  1. The Failure to Investigate Complicity of Shambhala Teachers and Other Leaders
In both the June and July 2018 BPS investigative memos, I raised concerns about leaders who were complicit in the Sakyong’s misconduct. There were credible witnesses supporting the allegation that David Brown, Jesse Grimes and Mitchell Levy knew that the Sakyong had sexually assaulted a woman in Chile in 2002.
Similarly, Joshua Silberstein, Wendy Friedman, Adam Lobel and others knew of the Sakyong’s assault in 2011. Some Shambhala leaders and teachers were also aware of the Sakyong’s misconduct in the 90s and early 2000s. For example, a woman who did not want her allegations investigated told me that after she reported to Shambhala that she was assaulted by the Sakyong in the early 2000s, someone was sent from Halifax to talk to her -- not to assist her, but to make sure she did not make her experience public.
Yet, none of these allegations of complicity were investigated. This is not normal, nor right. It is certainly not a way to restore trust to a community. (I recently reviewed the July 14, 2017 report of the Lewis Silkin investigation into the misconduct of Sogyal Lakar to see how they handled the issue of leadership complicity – it was part of the investigation.) Why would Shambhala choose to do this?
Finally
It appears that the Interim Board did not want to know the answers to a number of questions. Certainly, they did not want to know about the sexual assault in Chile and perhaps as importantly, they did not want to know who knew, who covered up, or who was complicit in 2002, 2011 or any other time.
I am acutely aware of the Interim Board’s loyalty to the Sakyong and possibly to some of the very people who were complicit. (I still have a headache from hearing that the Interim Board had “tea” with the Sakyong -- having never reached out to a single survivor.) I recommended an independent monitor specifically for this reason -- so that when all was said and done, there would be no concern about manipulation, about true independence, about the scope.
What I know is that a portion of the investigation was halted in December and the issue of the complicity of Shambhala leaders was eliminated from the scope. In 25 years of practice, I have never had a client that would dare to do either. I do not understand how an organization whose mission is to create enlightened society can hold itself below the moral and legal minimums of the society it wants to enlighten.
This is the end of a long road for me. It has been my privilege to walk this dark path of spiritual and institutional betrayal with so many brave people. Thank you to those who have provided support to all survivors, endured the painful process of bringing the truth to light, and encouraged me during this very difficult year. Thank you too for holding onto your own vision of enlightened society.
Note: I am doing an AMA (Ask me Anything) on Reddit on Thursday, April 11 from 8:00-9:00 PM Eastern. I look forward to answering your questions there.
submitted by cedaro0o to ShambhalaBuddhism [link] [comments]


2016.10.16 04:18 Solace-Siren I came across an article about toxic parents and this really resonated with me

"No one is responsible for anyone else's happiness — only we have the power to make ourselves truly happy. But as therapist Daniel S. Lobel, Ph. D., wrote in Psychology Today, some toxic mothers "see their children as forever obligated to them by rite of birth. They feel entitled to demand from their children unlimited support and service." These mothers are searching for the root of their unhappiness, and falsely believe that it lies in their child's refusal to give in to every single one of their demands.
If you have this kind of mother, you've probably spent a lot of your life hearing about how selfish you are. Know that this isn't true — this kind of toxic mother makes demands that are impossible to be completely complied with. And even if you somehow did do everything she asked, it wouldn't make your mother happy. As I got older, I realized how sadly ironic it was that my mother had cut everything out of her life that could have made her happier — friends, dating, fulfilling work — in order to laser-focus on me, in hopes that I could somehow fix her. You can't fix your mother, even if you want to, and you shouldn't feel guilty for failing to do so."
submitted by Solace-Siren to AsianParentStories [link] [comments]


Legendary Music Manager Steve Lobel Is Finally Happy ...